Tag Archives: Guelph Real Estate

Live-work buildings have a place in Guelph, but not at 15 Mont St.

Posted on by
Reply

Below is my contribution to the Guelph Citizen, published December 10th, 2014. The original article is here; and a counter-argument from the building’s architect can be read here.

Let me preface this argument by clarifying that it’s my firm belief that live-work apartments are an integral part of creating walkable cities, and intensifying city cores, as is Guelph’s directive. They have a positive impact towards reducing a city’s carbon footprint and improve density targets by better utilizing space in areas that are particularly starved by it.

Unfortunately, the developer planning to undertake 15 Mont St. has simply chosen the wrong battle. In reviewing the City’s zoning by-law and maps, it’s apparent that the corner of Mont and Woolwich is like many others in the downtown periphery. Many are zoned for office purposes along Woolwich, an arterial corridor, with low-density residential zoning along the side streets behind.

A 3-storey building currently occupies the corner of Mont and Woolwich, and is situated as far towards the eastern side of the property (towards Woolwich) as possible. 15 Mont St., the house whose existence hangs in the balance is placed on the westernmost side of its abutting property, creating the largest possible separation between the 2 buildings. This is often done to diminish shadow impact, noise pollution, etc., and is a fairly common design technique. It’s the same principles that are applied when deciding which types of development abut others; why factories don’t neighbour schools, for example.

The current three storey building at the corner of Woolwich and Mont

 

 

While still a relatively minor example of the instance above, an extension of the building at 360 Woolwich would envelop the majority of the lateral footprint of 15 Mont and have a detrimental impact on sightlines, noise and overall aesthetics, particularly affecting residents on the west end of Mont St. It’s important to additionally consider the style of the current office building and the virtual impossibility of incorporating the apartment addition in a way that blends at all naturally.

Furthermore, the property is located in an older, established area of the city. Live-work accommodations are more successful in the heart of the city, where amenities and employers are plentiful and directly accessible. The scale of the abutting office building is not to a level that would sustain the residential aspect of the development and tenants/owners would be no better served than a regular apartment building, for which the property is appropriately not zoned for.

mont2

The proposed development just in from the corner of Woolwich and Mont.

 

 

In summary, live-work buildings, when that’s what they are, are a major component of successful future growth in the City of Guelph. They do have a place though, and I don’t believe that place is 15 Mont St. Having said that, should this building go-ahead, I think it sets a whale of a precedent to accelerate future developments along the Gordon-Norfolk-Woolwich corridor, which in spots is an absolutely great thing for the city’s density targets and overall sustainability.

Tyson Hinschberger is a Realtor for Planet Realty Inc., Brokerage in the city of Guelph, Ontario. You can follow him on Twitter, @hinschcity. 

The Canadian Condo Market is an Open Bar Wedding

Posted on by
Reply

wedding_crashers_02Wedding season is essentially over. It’s cold, dreary, and unless someone gets pregnant, you’re probably not going to a wedding for the next little while. Chances are though, you went to at least one wedding this summer; and if there was an open bar, you got to see all kinds of kinds.

After an enlightening breakfast seminar with Craig Alexander, Chief Economist at TD Bank, last Friday morning, this blog post almost wrote itself. Craig described the overall real estate market in Canada, as an open bar. It’s traditionally a good thing, but the odd person goes overboard with varying degrees of consequence. Well, if that’s the case, then the condo markets in various cities are their own cast of characters.

At this open bar wedding we call the Canadian condo market, let’s grab a spot at that prime table between the bar and the dance floor and see who showed up. People watching can be a great time.

Vancouver: Who’s that guy? The one with an extra undone button or two? Fedora? Probably. Don’t worry about that him, that’s just Darrell (Or Darren, or Doug). I think he’s the bride’s dad’s friend. You know, the one all the kids call “uncle” but mostly because he’s older & drives a Mustang, and not because you put much stock into his guidance as an adult. He keeps reaching under his table and whipping out a fresh, cold Sapporo every 15 minutes or so. He also seems to have the inside track on shots of Russian Prince, but maybe it’s just optics. Regardless, it’s an open bar, and yet the guy is pulling this booze from anywhere and everywhere to keep an already roaring party going.

Vancouver’s real estate market features the highest percentage of cash purchases in North America. It’s also has the 4th highest sales of Mercedes-Benz cars in the world. The money? It’s not Canadian. It’s from Eastern Asia, an alternative to communist bank accounts or mattress stuffing. Like Darrell’s life skills, it’s all a facade. Side note: In reality, the guy was probably drinking something pretentious like Corona Light, but I changed the booze to fit the analogy. Sorry guys.

Calgary: We all know the bride’s kid brother had to feign interest through the ceremony, probably wishing he could just sit down. But after taking the obligatory 5th groomsman role, that wasn’t an option. Thankfully, 4 hours of photography later, it’s finally paid off. Now 19, and at his first open bar from the looks of things, this kid is pounding Coors Lights like they’re going out of style. The bar is fully stocked, he’s mixed in about 4 Red Bulls, and the night is young. My money’s on him to be the king of the dance floor about 11:30.

Even with the recent decline in oil prices, Calgary’s (and Edmonton’s) booming housing market is in it for the long haul. Relatively new to the dance, these markets are backed by real Canadian dollars, natural resources and when people are making $25/hour to pour coffee, naturally they can’t build fast enough to keep up with demand. Being young and free is the greatest.

Toronto: *Clinking Glass* Oooh, speeches. The moment of truth where we see just how hammered the Best Man is. The groomsmen’s gifts were flasks, and between that & cutting the bar line, this guy’s been to the well a few times. He’s got that slight lean thing happening, and his blinks are about 3 times longer than maybe they should be. We’re about 30 seconds away from either one of the finest clutch performances of public speaking or, the more likely, tales of crossing swords and poop jokes.

Toronto condos are the definition of a hot-button topic. People with no interest in real estate know about the Toronto real estate market, and absolutely have an opinion on it. Just like everybody somehow knows the Best Man, Toronto is top of mind in any real estate discussion. The speech equates to the inevitable rise in interest rates once the USA ends it quantitative easing processes and bond rates begin to rise. Then we’ll see how well the leveraged Toronto market withstands the jump in borrowing costs and the negative media attention that goes with it. Will prices hold? Only time will tell. But like the chances of the Best Man’s story not involving feces, I’m not wholly optimistic.

Kitchener: Unable to track down a bottle of sulfite-free, organic wine, the groom’s buddy (We’ll call him Gregory. Why not?) settles into dinner with a neat single-malt scotch. Despite the fact that nobody under 50 would ever do that, Gregory doesn’t care. He likes the taste, and by that, we all mean pretends to. Tequila shots and beer are too mainstream for this guy, and hey, it’s an open bar, he might as well go to town. That houndstooth tie screams “I’m better than you”, and we all know he believes it.

Condos? Pssh, lofts are where its at. At least according to every 21st century developer in Kitchener & into Waterloo. Arrow, Bauer, Seagram, Kaufman, the list goes on. Why build a new building where a house or parking lot was when we can just gut this old building with really high ceilings, huge windows and beautiful exposed brick? Actually, this does seem like an incredibly good idea. At a higher PPSF, the aforementioned buildings can justify it with stunning layouts that command deserved attention.

Waterloo: Ol’ Gramps is a bona fide member of the old boys’ club. He’s been around the block in his 60 plus years, so the only thing left to do is hit on good-looking 20-somethings. Just like the beer cart girls at the course, he’s overtipping to the tune of $5 bucks a Molson 50, just to get that blonde to smile. Sorry old gals, this suave gentleman’s only got eyes for the youngins. So what if he swings and misses? I doubt he really cares at this point. It’s all about this one night, so damn if Albert won’t enjoy himself.

Has anyone driven King St. North lately?! Holy. More and more student residences, admittedly of various types of ownership, but lets be honest; Waterloo developers are going to play the student angle until they’re blue in the face. If your kid doesn’t go to U of W, your money’s no good here. And you know what? More power to them. As the student population swells, so too will their profits. Who cares if the units don’t have balconies or functional layouts. Once they’re sold, they’re no longer the developers’ problem, so quick and cheap will be the way of the near future. More money for developers’ Lincolns & green fees. What happens as Universities shift to online entities? That’s the buyers’ problem to figure out.

Guelph: Is that suit from Men’s Warehouse? Sure it is. The bride’s cousin’s in University, so he’s working on a budget. Cut him some slack. He’s been clutching that fiver and looking at the bar longingly for an hour. His brother comes by with a drink and I’m no lip reader, but it’d seem he just realized it’s an open bar. Hah, yep. He stuffs the fiver, which now looks like it was his drink budget for the night, into his all-too-shiny suit pocket and dashes to order an Old Milwaukee, only to find real beers are also an option.

Just like this poor kid, Guelph finally realized that high-rise condos are a thing, and damn if they don’t taste better than the condo equivalent of Old Milwaukee. Granted, the condos Guelph had been working with are better than no condos, and certainly part of a healthy real estate mix. But just because we can build a bunch of 4-storey (soon to be 6-) wood frame, middle-of-the-road condos, doesn’t necessarily mean we should. It’s nice to settle into a Stella Artois once in a while, Guelph. Keep it up.

Montreal: There’s always a hot, sorta trashy looking 40-something floating around. Well, tonight is no different. Of the two table bottles, one was hers, and the other was the other five’s to split. And, well, look who’s first on the dance floor! Odds are, those heels will be off in about 10 minutes; since the red wine and vodka-crans are taking their toll. It’s that or a broken ankle. By the end of the night, this one’s going to be belligerent, vomiting, or some weirdly promiscuous combination of the two.

Sorry Montreal, I’m not buying that a big recession in unit sales in 2013 was a fluke. Among the big three markets, Montreal’s prices are the lowest, but affordability is still a concern. With large inventories, developers are probably feeling a little loose too. Expect that they may have to further incentivise pre-construction buying, which’ll continue to curb price growth, which has shrunk year-over-year, since 2010. Montreal might be a fun night for an 18-year old, but the long-term prospects aren’t stellar.

For some markets, the honeymoon might be over. I think we’ll have a better sense sometime in mid-2015. In the meantime, settle in and have a drink. Most markets are going to be fine. Especially around here.

What’s my home worth? This flyer told me I should know.

Posted on by
Reply

You know what people hate? Junk mail.

You know what some Realtors love to send people? Junk mail.

I’m sure there are more than a few people wondering what’s involved in one of those “free home evaluations” that you always get a flyer for. Hell, I got two this week (Sorry fellow agents, I threw them out), they must be important. Truth is home evaluations are actually a pretty handy marketing tool for agents, and useful knowledge for homeowners.

Are us Realtors really just giving away services? How do we make money?

As a seller, you've got a few options...

As a seller, you’ve got a few options…

Well, a home evaluation or “complementary market analysis” is a gateway, commonly referred to as a loss leader. They’re like a kids eat free promotion at a restaurant that gets hefty, football-watching, mammoth dads through the door to throw back a giant slab of meaty goodness for $30. Sure you lose out on the 5 bucks from little Jimmy’s grilled cheese and fries, but he’s not paying the bills or making the decisions. Realtors spend the time, for free, to scout your home and harvest you as a prospective client. Then they make that money back down the road on the sale of your home when you inevitably call them because they’ve established a relationship with you. This isn’t a tactic or scheme, it’s smart business. You’re not tied to them at all, so you’re still free to use whoever you’d like. It’s just that you’re more likely to call them, and they now know your home better than any other agent.

Keep in mind that as we go along here, there’s a difference between Realtors and appraisers. A Realtor can quickly give you a very good estimate of your house’s value, often from experience alone. It serves to come up with an attainable list price for your home that the market would be willing to pay. Realtors are often immersed in the marketplace on a daily basis and have a good sense of market conditions. Despite being accurate very often, they are certainly an opinion and the market will react as it will when the time comes. And, just like any business, you may get one or two “professionals” who are off-base, so make sure you do a little homework to pick someone well-qualified (Sidebar: I am well-qualified). It won’t hurt to get a second opinion if you feel the first is out of line.

There are 3 main methods of appraisal: the cost approach, sales comparison approach, and the income approach. The instances where each are used vary, and typically all home evaluations are done via a single means, due to their accuracy and consideration of timing.

The one you’re least likely to see is the income approach, unless you’re selling a multi-unit dwelling from which you garner regular revenues. It is mostly used for commercial and industrial valuations, and involves the use of discount rates and cash flows to determine a reasonable price to generate a sufficient return for the buyer. If comparable properties to the one we’re trying to price have a discount rate around 8%, and our unit brings in $24,000/year, then our value would be $300,000 ($24,000/0.08).

Still with me? Remember, that one doesn’t get used often. If you’re already lost, then I’ve done my selling job and made you need me even more. Excellent.

The second method -one that can be used more frequently in residential valuations- is the cost approach. Effectively, it equates to the cost to replicate the building, if the buyer were to build it to its current condition. It considers the value of the property, and then adds the cost of improvements, before also accounting for depreciation.

Here’s a VERY simplified example:

If a house was worth $250,000, and the seller installed a $10,000 rec room theatre system with a 20 year life, 3 years ago, the cost approach would then re-value the house at $258,500.

Make sense? The trouble with this method is that upgrades rarely see the true cost returned to a seller. If a house goes from a dump to fully-turnkey, there may be a profit margin for the seller. Often though, if there is more work to be done, buyers will see that before the true value of renovations. It is also hard to gauge land value premiums, and incorporate those true costs, since the available for vacant land, particularly in subdivisions, has been slim for many years.

So let’s take a look at the one your Realtor will do for you, since it’s the one that you’re probably most interested in.

The sales comparison approach is what you’ll get when you bring in a Realtor, be it from junk mail or their awesome, informative blog posts- either or. It’s the most effective way of determining market conditions on a city-by-city, neighbourhood-by-neighbourhood, street-by-street basis. Using information that they alone can access, Realtors are able to determine the market value of your home by comparing a number of variables within your home, to others that have sold previously.

A Realtor will develop a list of similar properties called “comparables”, and adjust their estimate of your home’s value by the differences in those homes and the subsequent changes in price associated with those differences. Some common variables include, but are certainly not limited to: the number of bedrooms and bathrooms, square footage, sale date and house style, all of which can have a large impact on the price of the house. With the development of subdivisions and model homes, it’s become even easier to find accurate comparables, since identical layouts and floor plans are used in multiple homes in the same area. Sometimes, variables such as how well a home shows to potential buyers requires putting a dollar value on a qualitative impression. That quantifying ability comes from experience and knowledge of what attracts buyers, along with what buyers are willing to pay for…and ultimately, how much.

Here’s an purely hypothetical example that illustrates the sales comparison approach. Again, it’s very simplified, but hey.

Mike’s house has 3 bedrooms, 2 baths, 1800 square feet and is a 2-storey detached house in the Westminster Woods neighbourhood.

Now, a value is determined for each variable, which is then roughly applied to the price of the best comparables. This can be done using common market estimates of value, or for the most specific info, by virtue of a regression analysis. For the purposes of the example, we’ll say that bedrooms are worth $25,000;  full baths are $20,000; space is valued at $50/sq. ft., and comparable home prices have gone up an average of $24,000 in the past year.

So, with that taken into consideration, Mike’s Realtor finds that a good comparable for his home is another two-storey detached home sold in Westminster Woods, 4 months ago. It had 4 bedrooms, 2.5 bathrooms and was 1920 square feet. It sold for it’s full asking price of $465,000.

Here is where being decent at math is a big plus. You’d first subtract $25,000 from that price to account for the drop from 4 bedrooms to 3; then take off another $10k for the half-bath Mike doesn’t have. By also having 120 less square feet, the Realtor would drop $6,000 off the $465,000 as well. It’s not all bad news for Mike though. Given the strong market and home values rising $2,000/month, Mike can expect $8,000 more than he would’ve got if the houses had sold at the same time.

Therefore, we can see the value estimate as follows: $465,000-$25,000-$10,000-$6,000+$8,000= $432,000. Even though his house was valued at $432,000, Mike would probably factor some negotiating room into his listing price. For that reason, Realtors are invaluable, since the sale price should be a much greater consideration than the listing price, which is often all the public has access to.

Every house has a price, but finding the right one, right away, is the key to a quick, hassle-free sale. If you comparison shop Realtors and get multiple estimates before listing your home, keep in mind that the highest one isn’t necessarily the best. It might be, and your house may sell for that. But overpricing your house can be dangerous, since a house that sits develops a stigma and can often sell for less than it otherwise may have if priced correctly at the beginning.

Realtors are an invaluable resource when it comes to selling your home. A home evaluation can be helpful to homeowners, even before the time comes to sell. It can help establish a budget for your next purchase, and plan for your future. For a free home evaluation, call me at 519-837-0900, or just wait for anyone to drop a flyer in your mailbox. I know which one I’d choose.

How To Ruin Your Landlord’s Sale

Posted on by
Reply

Wow, what a week so far. The cat’s away, but it means this mouse has a ton more work to do to cover. Sorry that you’re just getting this now.

I’ve been through a lot of houses in my day. Growing up, with both my mom and grandmother in the industry, I spent a lot of time in model homes. Granted, most of that time was spent being bored out of my skull, but it probably skewed my expectations of what homes were supposed to look like.

Not every home can be a model home. We don’t all have the money to hire designers, stagers and other “make it look pretty” specialists. Some day I’ll do a post explaining the merits of using these folks when it comes time to sell, but that’s for another day.

Whenever someone lists their home for sale, a good agent will spend some time advising them of the little things they can do to make their home more saleable. The number one item on said list is, almost always, tidying up. A clean home will always show better than a messy one, and if nothing else, will keep the potential buyer in a pleasant mood walking through your place. It doesn’t have to show like those model homes, most buyers won’t have that expectation. It should however, look like something someone would want to buy.

So what happens when you’re selling a home that you don’t live in? Landlords put a lot of trust in their tenants to make their living quarters show-worthy. And from experiences, tenants couldn’t give less of a damn.

It’s one thing to keep a clean house because you should. It’s much more enjoyable: Fresh smells, open space, readiness to entertain when the mood strikes, etc. If that’s not your thing, fine, understood, we all let our place go here and there.

It’s another thing altogether when the person whose house you’re living in asks you to do them a solid and you blatantly disregard their request. I mean hey, if you pay your $400 bucks for a summer room, you should get to do whatever you want, that’s what the $400’s for right? Put a hole in a wall or two, slap up some Element stickers on your bedroom door, go to town. (Sidenote: Show of hands for anyone who’s seen stickers on a door/wall/window and been like, “Wow, that looks great, I should definitely do that”.) It’s an absolute disgrace what some of these tenants do, and it’s probably going to mean that the houses we saw won’t be moving any time soon.

So here are two houses I’ve seen this week:

The University House, Waterloo

This thing was as a pure a student ghetto hellhole as I’ve seen. I got to tour student rentals a ton in university, and this thing took the cake. Great price for fully licensed, registered duplex, but no MLS pictures- sign number 1 that this wasn’t going to be a great time. If you’ve got nothing to hide, you’re definitely putting pictures of the place on MLS, so let’s suffice to say that I wasn’t going to be blown away the interior.

Well I was, but not in a great way. After knocking (tenants may or may not be home), I let myself in with the key from the lockbox. Announced myself. Nothing. Okay, we’re good to go here.

First room- Living room. Great size. They’ve got 4 chairs huddled around a little flat screen and two couches on either side of a coffee table. At least I think it was a coffee table, it was covered in garbage that I didn’t really notice because my eyes were drawn to 2 things. The first, this hunting knife in a sleeve. Terrifying on it’s own.

Super terrifying on a stack of movies like Slash. 

Welcome to our home! Stay a while?

Welcome to our home! Stay a while?

Yeah, okay. It’s at this point that I’m torn between how utterly ridiculous and amazing it is to find this chilling on someone’s coffee table, and how I should’ve been an accountant, never finding myself here in the first place.

Sure enough, now I hear footsteps. I’m kidding myself right? I mean, totally psyching myself out after seeing this stuff. I turn around to the doorway on the right. It’s the kitchen. Through the doorway on the wall is a rack. A rack of more knives. Just hanging there, waiting for whoever’s making these footsteps to come put them to good use.

At this point I’ve noticed 3 things: the living room layout, The Stabber’s Beginners Kit, and a wall of knives he can graduate up to.

Fun. And now footsteps guy peeks around the corner.

“Hey,” says a lanky kid with glasses. Anticlimactic as anything.

“Uh, hey, how’s it going chief? Just here for the 11 o’clock showing, mind if I look around?”

“I guess. The one guy’s bedroom’s locked, and the other guy’s in the shower.”

Awesome. Hey, I gave you guys about 40 hours’ notice I was coming and you picked now to shower? And your pal couldn’t leave the door open? Great. I quickly learn that there are 6 rooms on this floor, and I can’t see a third of them.

I get the idea from the 4 I can see and make my way downstairs to the shared laundry. A fairly new washer and dryer are a nice surprise. +1. (I think that brings us to -12)

I knock entering the second unit downstairs. Guy pops out of his pitch black room asking if he can help me. Obviously didn’t get the memo. Not only that, but he goes back in after announcing himself and closes the door. Just going to assume that room was a palace and move on. The “kitchen” downstairs -which the listing said included a stove- had no stove. A microwave and a sink. A Kraft Dinner maker and some water to wash your bowl with.

Two more bedrooms painted in kindergarten green and I was over this place. Not something my customer was looking for. There wasn’t a living room in the basement, which makes it harder to rent to groups anyway. For as awful as the house was, the guys inside it could’ve cleaned up, and at the very least, not done their best to creep the hell out of me.

A great introduction to the world of showing student rentals to say the least.

The Off-Scottsdale Rental, Guelph

I can’t say exactly where this house is, given that it’s still on the market, but it’s in a primarily student-rental neighbourhood off of Scottsdale in Guelph. I showed it Tuesday night… in the pouring rain…with the wrong lockbox combination. Needless to say, after 2 phone calls and 5 minutes in the downpour, we were already regretting our decision to take a look. It didn’t get a whole lot better from there.

The house was an exact replica of my first student house on Sidney Cres., which was nice in that I’d know where everything was. We started the main floor tour in the kitchen, lined with next-to-empty 40’s of bargain bin liquor. I guess when you live close to an LCBO but not a Beer Store, the bottles tend to pile up. You can get them easily but it’s just such an inconvenience to take them anywhere, let alone just recycle.

The rest of the main floor was pretty vanilla, so we knocked on the basement door. Just music. Knock again.

“WHAT?”

“Oh, hey, just here for the showing.” I turn to my client who’s thinking exactly the same thing: Upstairs first.

Luckily the upstairs did the trick.

The first room, a bathroom, was quite the treat. I never quite understood how people lived with toilet paper scraps all over the floor or, for that matter, how they get there in the first place. Is it sheer boredom? The only thing worth doing while you’re on the john is tearing up paper and littering your floor? That’s what Angry Birds and Fruit Ninja were designed specifically for.

This. Pretty much.

This. Pretty much.

There was a bedroom with nothing in it; a second bedroom with sheets and a few cases worth of Pure Life bottles scattered all over; and a third bedroom, locked, with a TV clearly audible and nobody willing to let us in. Grand.

This place had a great backyard and the deck was custom-built to fit a hot tub, which was noticeably absent. Ultimately it was shame that my buyer didn’t like the house, because the lot and layout would’ve been fantastic.

Sometimes it’s hard to see past cosmetics. It’s always hard to buy something you can’t even see. Put them together, and the recipe for the sale isn’t there 9 times out of ten. It’s like accidentally using salt instead of sugar. It’s disappointing and leaves a bad taste in your mouth.

Where do we put the students?

Posted on by
Reply
Student housing to parents.

Student housing to parents.

I use the term “we” very loosely as not 12 months ago, I was one of these “students” (read: messy, loud, rude vermin). And even though the debate raged in the media throughout my 4-year tenure at the University of Guelph, nobody seemed to put forward any concrete suggestions as to how to appease the student population or the long-term residents of various neighbourhoods.

Student housing to neighbours.

Student housing to neighbours.

Living in the Westminster Woods neighbourhood at the south-end, I was lucky enough that my neighbours had no ill-will towards myself or my roommates, at least that we were aware of. We were clean, respectful and -save for special occasions- dead quiet. Take a survey though, and you’d get the impression that we were in the heavy minority.

University towns like Guelph, Kingston and Waterloo are inevitably going to have a large rental population in the surrounding neighbourhoods. Given that most students operate on tight budgets and thus don’t rely on a car, this student distribution is heavily centred within the immediate vicinity of the school or along bus corridors. So, if you live close to a school, chances are, you’ll have students living on your street: it’s Urban Economics 101.

Rather than turn the Mayfield Park area, or the Gordon St. Corridor into the second coming of Queen’s student ghetto, we have to look at some progressive alternatives to the currently dysfunctional student-resident relationship. Personally, my experiences with the student-resident dynamic have been quite positive. But that doesn’t mean other students and owners haven’t gotten into it over things like taunting a goose with a ball. It seems like there can’t be pleasing everyone until they’re separated like toddlers on a timeout.

So how do we separate them? Where do the students go?

The ever-popular student destination in Guelph is Edinburgh Village. A world all its own, Edinburgh Village is home to only students and is isolated by a major road, forest, farmland and a plaza in each direction. They do really well at filling their sizeable development with students year-after-year. And not only do they fill it, they charge above-market rents to the tune of $550 per room, per month. Plus utilities. How? Location, location… you’ve heard it a million times. A short jaunt along a weather beaten “cow path” and you’d find yourself at the University in a matter of minutes.

So, if students will pay this much to live in an apartment, with a residence atmosphere and paper walls; is it so shocking that they’d flock to Mayfield Park and Old University which are both equally proximate, quieter, more spacious and the same price or cheaper?

No. At least not to me. I don’t think it would be to you either. It’s not exactly rocket scientist (-Deena, Jersey Shore). Sorry.

A rendering of Abode's proposal

A rendering of Abode’s proposal

Well then, along comes Abode Varsity Living to a chorus of boos from residents. Wait, what? They’re going to build a place to put the students that live among you and it’s not welcome? NIMBYism at its finest.

“We don’t want students living on our street, can’t you put them somewhere like a residence?”

“NO! Don’t build that residence THERE!”

And this is why real estate development is a pain-staking, drawn out process. It’s been 2 and half years since Abode submitted their proposal to the City of Guelph to re-zone and re-develop the lands currently housing a Best Western hotel and conference centre spot on the corner of Gordon St. & Stone Road, the gateway to Mayfield Park. Save for the scale of the project, I don’t understand why this isn’t a great location for a ton of students. Guelph has a floundering tourism industry, which, for all this city has, isn’t one of its finest efforts. So why not make better use of the property which has already served as a satellite residence for first-year students at peak times?

Well, suffice to say that the OMB (Ontario Municipal Board) ruled very much in favour in Abode’s proposal, despite the objections of both the City of Guelph and the Mayfield Park Residents’ Association, who was also party to the decision and fully armed with counsel and precendent. It just makes sense. If you want the students to “go away”, you need somewhere to put them. And since they are paying for it themselves, you’re going to have to make it somewhere they want to go.

So, we end up with a high-density, student-centric development closer to moving ahead; and at the cost of only a few years’ time, thousands and thousands of dollars & boatloads of grief for everyone. All to save a couple units and maybe a floor or two.  Was it worth it? For Abode, certainly. For the city, and Mayfield Park? It’ll depend on what the final design looks like, but I’m leaning towards a solid no on this one.